| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Dec | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
afghanistan barack obama Barak Obama behavior beijing book publishing boycott china communication congress dalai lama delegate count democratic national convention democratic party denver dnc election elections ethics fear George W. Bush Hillary Clinton iraq john-mccain journalism linguistics media bias ohio olympics presidential campaign primaries protests republicans Richard Cheney saturday night live saying anything Scott McClellan shrillness shrill voice texas tibet tibetan independence u.s. economy united states what happened
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Finding hope for democracy in what Obama says and how he says it
For the past eight years, we’ve had a president who stumbled over the English language so often that his handlers made sure he always read prepared statements instead of making blunders by speaking off the cuff.
In fact, if there is any area where I absolutely saw clear improvement in the performance of George W. Bush as president, I have to admit that by the end of his term he became much better at reading his statements aloud. When I heard him on the radio without seeing him looking down at his notes, Bush almost sounded like he was talking instead of reading.
Barack Obama, in contrast, speaks naturally in complete and grammatically correct sentences. He may occasionally use colloquialisms, and his speech may echo cadences from the African-American community, which is fine, yet he has a clear command of the English language wholly lacking in our previous president.
Read the rest of the item….