Global Sense was
            written in summer 1997 after hearing the scare stories
            about Internet technocrats trying to use their "generic
            Top-Level Domain names Memorandum of Understanding"
            (gTLD-MoU) as a ruse for taking over domain name system
            policymaking, apparently acting at the behest of world
            trademark holders. A very scary story, but is it true? We
            live in a world where anything and everything is
            possible, but what is probable here?
            
            Global Sense was my
            method for thinking about the implications of the "gTLD"
            plan for network governance. We're witnessing the
            privatazation of our public utility without any public
            vote in the matter. The internet is a powerful cultural
            force, so I do not wish to see a despotic Internet regime
            spawn despotism in the world. Given the acts of leading
            players through ICANN,
            my concerns are more justified today than ever before.
            The reasons for adopting open network democracy in
            Global Sense make more sense now than
            ever.
            
            Global Sense was built
            from the reasoning in Common Sense. Thomas Paine
            stated the case for the independence of a continent tied
            to an island. Having seen monarchies subject people to
            whims, having been inspired by the Enlightenment thinkers
            and the spirit of his times, Paine envisioned a
            constitutional democracy in a nation of laws, not
            dictums. Foreseeing educated individuals accepting
            responsibility for governing themselve, his deist beliefs
            told him that humanity is quite capable of individual and
            national self rule.
            
            Now study the situation for
            network democracy. Cyberspace is bound only by digital
            server capacity in physical space. Like a galaxy tied to
            a star, the decentralized network of networks demands
            decentralized management, not hierarchial top-down
            rulership by Internet royalty. Deeply media literate
            people, aware of our common interactivity, are capable of
            deciding Internet policy by direct democracy under a
            global Internet constitition. In the spirit of our times,
            therefore, becuase how we govern the internet does affect
            how we govern the world, Global Sense attempts to
            do for the Internet what Common Sense did for
            America. An ambitious undertaking, but I'm more
            evolutionary than revolutionary, I'm encouraging network
            democracy in a grassroots way, one mind at a time, so a
            desire for democracy springs from within us and endures.
            I'm planting seedthoughts for tomorrow.
            
            Global Sense closely
            tracks the arguments that Thomas Paine applied in
            Common Sense almost 225 years ago to present the
            case for national independence. I'm mirroring his logic
            to present the case for world interdependence. I've
            paraphrased hm do discuss our situation today, and if
            there are errors in the reasoning, the mistakes are mine,
            not his When the essay was written in 1997, by the way,
            the words rushed through me like wind. I did not touch
            the work after posting it until late 1999, while redoing
            the page layouts, Amazed and grateful by how little
            revising was needed (the initial version in the
            first
            edition archive), I now
            offer the essay for your consideration with minor updates
            in reference to changing events. My prayer is that you
            will be both informed and inspired from the
            work.
            
            For the record, I'm now
            rewriting Global Sense into a book
            that moves beyond the issue of network governance. I'm
            writing about the cultural power of the global
            sensibility emerging from a planetary network of
            networks, the feelings of interactivity with one another
            shifting how we interact in life. Knowing our
            interactivity, we tend to practice responsible self
            rule. We prevent freedom from decaying into anarchy.
            Instead of becoming yet another drug to enthrall us,
            interactive media instead could be a tool for our
            liberation -- if "we the people" claim our power to
            change the world through every interaction. Will we use
            new media to help humanity masture enough at last for
            democracy to work? Let is be so. 
            
            As you read, please appreciate
            that here is the same core principle of unity amid
            diversity known to the ancient sages, updated into media
            terms that slip past our isms with simple logic.
            Think about it. In our interactive world, personal
            democracy makes global sense. 
            
            Judah Ken Freed
            May
            2000. . .. . . .